Brian
B. Donohue-Lynch
Quinebaug Valley Com.-Tech College
Danielson, CT
-----Original Message-----
From: Ilene Frank (REF) <ifrank@dudley.lib.usf.edu>
To: Steve McCarty <steve_mc@ws0.kagawa-jc.ac.jp>
Cc: KEYONE-L@hawaii.edu <KEYONE-L@hawaii.edu>
Date: Thursday, April 09, 1998 8:57 AM
Subject: Re: Re Keynote 1 (FWD)
>On Wed, 8 Apr 1998, Steve McCarty wrote:
>
>> This is forwarded anonymously by permission of the writer:
>>
>> >We who do spend time and effort on web pages, on-line instruction, do
need
>> >some independent source to verify that what we are doing is top quality
(or,
>> >on the other hand, poor). Most examples of online courses seemed to
be
>> >"how to" --how to surf the internet.. for example. So when I found an
>> >online course in my field, using the text I am using, I asked and
received
>> >permission to "lurk and surf" for a week. On the one hand, the physical
>> >layout of the pages, and ease of movement and feedback, were excellent.
On
>> >the other, the content was very poor. This course was not worth 3 cr,
and
>> >not comparable to any 3 cr course given, I submit, on any campus
anywhere.
>
>Don't your universities and departments have curriculum committees that
>deal with these issues? I'm not quite sure why distance education courses
>would be treated any differently. What's the difference between a given
>Political Science Department offering a crummy face to face course and a
>crummy Distance Education course? Can anyone chime in here?
>
>Ilene Frank, Reference Dept.
>Tampa Campus Library, LIB 122
>University of South Florida, Tampa FL 33620
>ifrank@lib.usf.edu Work 813.974.2483
>http://www.lib.usf.edu/~ifrank/
>
>